Is inaction an indirect intention?

Omission crime and indirect intentional crime are two different levels of concepts, there is no one-to-one correspondence. Omission crime can be direct intentional crime, indirect intentional crime, or negligent crime.

Harmful acts in the objective aspect of crime can be divided into acts and omissions. Those who commit crimes in a way of inaction are called inaction crimes. The core of inaction crime is that the behavior of the perpetrator violates the law s order norms , that is, should do nothing, which is the opposite concept as being a crime, and has no direct connection with the subjective mental state of the perpetrator.

Indirect intentional refers to the psychological attitude of the perpetrator that the perpetrator knows that his or her behavior will cause the harmful result to occur, but allows the harmful result to occur. The key to judging indirect intentional lies in the actor s consciousness factor and will factor, which is a concept opposite to the direct intentional intention, but not directly related to the objective behavior of the actor.

The crime of inaction and indirect intentional crime are two different levels of concepts. There is no one-to-one correspondence. The crime of inaction can be a direct intentional crime, an indirect intentional crime, or a negligent crime.

Omission of crime and indirect intentional crime are two-level concepts, so there is no one-to-one correspondence between them, so inaction is not an indirect intentional crime, because it can be an indirect intentional crime, and it can also be a fault criminal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *